Optimal Trauma Activation Criteria for "Found Down" Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Patients who are found down (FD) with unknown mechanism of injury pose a triage dilemma. At the study institution, this population with any "suspicion of trauma" criteria were previously triaged as a trauma team activation (TTA) but due to high rates of mis-triage was modified to "signs of trauma." The purpose of this study is to compare injured and uninjured FD patients to identify patient characteristics and outcomes, and to evaluate triage accuracy of signs of trauma. METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was conducted on adult patients who were FD between 1/2019 and 4/2021. Based on injury severity score (ISS), FD patients were categorized as injured or uninjured and these groups were compared. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for signs and suspicion of trauma as triage criteria, where suspicion of trauma included altered mental status, confusion, seizures, intoxication, or dementia. Signs of trauma were defined as abrasions, lacerations, ecchymosis, contusions, hematomas, deformity, pain, and crepitus. RESULTS: 415 FD patients were identified with 273 (65.8%) sustaining injury and 142 (34.2%) uninjured. There were no differences in age, gender, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, or vital signs. Signs of trauma had high sensitivity (96.0%) and moderate specificity (82.4%) for injury, whereas suspicion of trauma had low sensitivity (2.2%) and specificity (37.3%). CONCLUSION: Injured and uninjured FD trauma patients had similar characteristics on arrival including GCS and vitals, emphasizing the challenge of identifying patients with injury requiring trauma evaluation. Signs of trauma represent a valuable indicator of injury in the FD population.

STRAUMA: A Novel Alert System for a Combined Stroke and Trauma.

INTRODUCTION: Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) can lead to traumatic injury. While timely administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) can be lifesaving in CVAs, it is contraindicated with active bleeding. A STRAUMA is a combined stroke and highest-level trauma activation for patients with suspected CVA and signs of trauma. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of the STRAUMA activation on time to CT and patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on adult patients presenting to a Level 1 trauma and comprehensive stroke center with signs of CVA between 01/2019 and 09/2020. Patients who had a STRAUMA activation were compared to patients who had a stroke alert. RESULTS: Five hundred and eighty patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 111 had STRAUMA activations and 469 had stroke alerts. There were no differences in age, gender, or anticoagulation use. The STRAUMA group had a higher NIH stroke scale (NIHSS) (11 vs 5, P<.0001). The STRAUMA group had a longer time to CT (23.1 min vs 16.9 min, P<.0001) and a lower rate of tPA (13.5% vs 27.9%, P = .001). Time to tPA and thrombectomy were similar. The STRAUMA group had a 15% rate of traumatic injury with a median injury severity score of 9. Mortality was higher in the STRAUMA group (14.4% vs 6.0%, P = .003). Multivariable logistic regression identified NIHSS and time to CT as predictors of mortality. STRAUMA did not predict mortality. CONCLUSION: The novel STRAUMA activation allows for an evaluation of both stroke and trauma to facilitate safe and timely administration of lifesaving interventions.

A Cluster Randomized-Controlled Trial of the Impact of the Tools of the Mind Curriculum on Self-Regulation in Canadian Preschoolers.

Early self-regulation predicts school readiness, academic success, and quality of life in adulthood. Its development in the preschool years is rapid and also malleable. Thus, preschool curricula that promote the development of self-regulation may help set children on a more positive developmental trajectory. We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the Tools of the Mind preschool curriculum, a program that targets self-regulation through imaginative play and self-regulatory language (Tools; clinical trials identifier NCT02462733). Previous research with Tools is limited, with mixed evidence of its effectiveness. Moreover, it is unclear whether it would benefit all preschoolers or primarily those with poorly developed cognitive capacities (e.g., language, executive function, attention). The study goals were to ascertain whether the Tools program leads to greater gains in self-regulation compared to Playing to Learn (YMCA PTL), another play based program that does not target self-regulation specifically, and whether the effects were moderated by children's initial language and hyperactivity/inattention. Two hundred and sixty 3- to 4-year-olds attending 20 largely urban daycares were randomly assigned, at the site level, to receive either Tools or YMCA PTL (the business-as-usual curriculum) for 15 months. We assessed self-regulation at pre-, mid and post intervention, using two executive function tasks, and two questionnaires regarding behavior at home and at school, to capture development in cognitive as well as socio-emotional aspects of self-regulation. Fidelity data showed that only the teachers at the Tools sites implemented Tools, and did so with reasonable success. We found that children who received Tools made greater gains on a behavioral measure of executive function than their YMCA PTL peers, but the difference was significant only for those children whose parents rated them high in hyperactivity/inattention initially. The effect of Tools did not vary with children's initial language skills. We suggest that, as both programs promote quality play and that the two groups fared similarly well overall, Tools and YMCA PTL may be effective curricula choices for a diverse preschool classroom. However, Tools may be advantageous in classrooms with children experiencing greater challenges with self-regulation, at no apparent cost to those less challenged in this regard.

Development and implementation of the Memorial Emergency Department Fall Risk Assessment Tool.

The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of an evidence-based, emergency department (ED) fall risk assessment tool as a sensitive predictor for falls in the ED population. The overarching goal of the project was to improve patient safety and eliminate patient falls resulting in serious injury in the ED. An ED-specific tool was designed on the basis of the risk factors consistently identified in the literature: prior fall history, impaired mobility, altered mental status, altered elimination, and the use of sedative medication. The Memorial ED Fall Risk Assessment Tool was validated in two EDs (North campus and Central campus) located within a large urban health care system in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The two EDs have a combined 140,000 annual patient visits. The Memorial ED Fall Risk Assessment Tool appears to be a valid tool for this two-ED hospital system.